Survey highlights flexibility penalty for mums
Despite the post-Covid move to more flexible working, many mums are struggling to get the...read more
AI won’t take your job. It will be the humans who understand it better who will.
Yesterday morning I got an email from my former university. Ping! It asked me to take part in a survey about AI and journalism. Despite the fact that it assumed I was working for the kind of regular newsroom I have not been in for years, I decided to take part. It was an interesting experience. It asked me lots of questions about what I thought about AI, but mainly about whether I used it and for what.
I’ve seen other surveys and they are fairly general. But this one was specific. It asked me if I used it for checking copyright, whether I used it for proof-reading or doing research or presenting my findings as a powerpoint or numerous other things. I have to admit that I hardly use it at all. The only thing I have dabbled in is social media posts and then I have to edit them to tone down the enthusiasm, given they all seem to me to be based on a very over-excited American teenager and not the kind of person I think I am aiming at, someone who has been beaten about the edges by life and is very, very tired. Maybe it’s me who is in the wrong.
I recall being at a previous job where we were writing for parents about the education system. I had to write the weekly newsletter. I tended to begin with a dry, downbeat assessment of the world – even back then things were not great – or the weather. I was told that I needed to be more upbeat and pretend that it wasn’t in fact raining all the time that summer. I argued that pretending that the weather was great wasn’t going to make people read the newsletter, but maybe that’s the kind of world we live in today and it is me who is out of date…
Anyhow, apparently ChatGPT can do all sorts of things that might actually be useful to me as a journalist, just as Google Meet can send you a transcript of your interviews so you only have to edit the words into article form, saving lots of valuable time and freeing you up to do more interviews. Amazing. I can be doubly productive and focus on the things I like doing rather than trying to read my shorthand. I’m beginning to realise that AI might not be such a bad thing, as long as I am in control of the information and can check it. My big worry – based on talking to academics who know about this stuff – is its accuracy and the bias that can be built in. Of course, humans have all sorts of biases too, but the thing with AI is that it doesn’t admit it is wrong easily, unless a human reviews the algorithms it lives by.
Someone said to me the other day that the most valuable thing anyone had told her lately was that AI won’t take her job. It will be the humans who understand it better who will. It’s on all of us to figure out what it can do to make our particular jobs easier, but employers need to allow us the time to do so.