
New Act aims to prevent sexual harassment at work
The Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act which covers sexual harassment...read more
My wife has recently returned to work after being off on maternity for 11 months. Whilst she was off, her job was advertised as a permanent post under a more junior title but with the same responsibilities. A person was hired but resigned before my wife returned. Upon returning, she agreed with her employer that she would work a four-day week and a new contract was issued. Like her previous contract, it stated that she would report direct to the managing director. However, she now finds herself in a position where all her business is now to be reported to another non executive director and that this director will sign off any commissions due. In all but title, she has been demoted. Upon returning she checked with the MD, finance and HR that her commission structure would remain the same as before maternity. All confirmed that it would. Since then she has overachieved against her targets, but the company have chosen not to pay her commission. Other employees have been paid their commission. Is this discrimination and what should she do?
She could consider taking out a grievance against your employer to show she has exhausted the internal channels for resolving any dispute before taking it externally. She is entitled to return to her previous position, or a similar one, so they can’t advertise or give away her job while she is on leave, unless it is to cover her leave period.
You mention a ‘new contract’ but that is inaccurate – she has had some terms and conditions changed, but is still on the same contract with the same start date for continuous service, so she doesn’t have a new contract.
It is unclear if the commission system in place is contractual or discretionary – if it is contractual they certainly can’t just change it like that. But even if it is discretionary, they need to apply it fairly and consistently. So if she can show that she isn’t being treated fairly compared to a male comparator, she could certainly have grounds for a discrimination claim.