
Hybrid and remote working: your rights
Can an employee demand to work from home; can an employer force an employee to come into...read more
Can an employer make me redundant simply because they want me to work full time when I currently only work part time? I am not convinced that this is a redundancy as my position or work is not diminishing. If anything the argument is that there is too much work for me to carry it out part time. If it was a redundancy, I would be the only person in the pool as I am the only person working part time. I would like to know what would happen if I do not agree to increasing my hours. They have mentioned that this could result in me being made redundant, but I don’t agree with this. I don’t want to cause any trouble and accept that I may not be able to continue working there, but shouldn’t I be offered a Settlement Agreement instead of being made redundant?
It’s important to check what are your contractual hours in your employment contract.
It’s also important whether you have always been on a part-time contract, or whether you have been full time with this company in the past and gone to part time latterly. You are in a stronger position if the contract is, or has always been, part time.
1. It would be unwise for the company to insist that a role can only be done full-time; taking this position is a form of indirect gender
It would also be difficult for the company to argue a valid case for making a role redundant where the workload is actually increasing, as you say, because there are no reduced requirements.
2. It’s difficult, of course, to predict what the Company will do if you do not agree to increase your hours.
However, an ET would look unfavourably on a company that made an employee redundant because they couldn’t extend their hours to fill the increasing requirements of a role. The company would need to show to an ET that they had made an effort to consider other alternatives before making your role redundant – for example: taking on an additional person and making the role a job share, where two or more people share what is then a full-time position or dividing up the additional tasks across other members of the team.
If the company has actually cited redundancy as a consequence of you not increasing your hours , that is unlawful and does not follow the correct process.
We would suggest that you check your contractual hours, then propose a meeting with the company. At the meeting ask if they can discuss various options to meet the new job requirements: job sharing the role, i.e so advertising for another part-time role and be prepared to be involved in the recruitment process for a job share.
Karen Holden from A City Law Firm looks at the various legal issues that have arisen as more people choose to work remotely or in a hybrid way after... read more
New mothers try to cope with the cost of living crisis
The UK's state maternity pay is just half of the living wage and has only been increased by 3% this year, while inflation is three times higher.... read more
My return date in July after Maternity Allowance follows 52 weeks of maternity leave. My company runs holidays from March to April, and they have told... read more
Is the Government's review of the future of the work a welcome attempt to address crucial employment issues after Covid or is it designed to avoid... read more
Comments [2]
Barry Gapper says:
I have always worked part-time but my company want to replace me with someone to work full-time but do not want to do a job share, they would just like me to leave with no redundancy pay. What am I entitled to.
Mandy Garner says:
Please write to mandy.garner@workingmums.co.uk with more details about your situation and we can advise you. What is their argument, for instance, that you do not qualify for redundancy pay?